Intel Capital Tops List as Most Active Venture Firm of the Last Decade

According to a recent survey of PE Hub's VentureXpert Database, Intel Capital invested in more U.S.-based companies than any other venture capital fund.  That may come as a surprise to many, particularly since Intel Capital the corporate investment of the technology giant, Intel, not a traditional venture capital firm.  Interestingly, number two on the list, JP Morgan, isn't a venture capital firm, either.  The traditional venture firms begin to appear at number three with NEADFJ, Sequoia, KPCB, Bessemer, USVP, Goldman Sachs (the second investment bank on the list) and Venrock round out the list. 

Norwest closes $1.2 billion fund; is there light at the end of the tunnel?

In a continued run of positive news for the emerging company, venture capital industry over the last few weeks, Norwest Venture Partners just announced that it closed a $1.2 billion fund  to invest globally in private companies across a number of industry sectors.  Norwest's new fund is particularly impressive considering that the entire venture capital community only raised $1.7 billion in new or follow-on funds in the third quarter of 2009, according to the National Venture Capital Association and Thomson Reuters.  The Q3 results marked the second consecutive quarterly decline in terms of the total number of venture funds raising capital and aggregate dollars raised by those funds.

We obviously don't want to get ahead of ourselves with optimism.  A few lucrative exits and a massive raise by a Silicon Valley stalwart doesn't necessarily mean that the industry is poised for a turnaround.  It is certainly the case that the two are not related, as Norwest has likely been working on this raise for months.  Yet, the timing couldn't be better, in my opinion, because it feels like momentum is beginning to swell.  The emerging company, venture capital industry is very circular in nature. Increased exit opportunities enable funds to raise additional capital from existing and new limited partners.  As those cash coffers grow, more and more private companies receive funding, which will help the newly funded companies grow into attractive exit candidates.  Wash, rinse, repeat.

Are we in the midst of a turnaround?  We'll all know soon enough.

Venture Capital Industry Shows Uptick in Returns

For the first time in nearly a year, the venture capital industry showed a positive return, according to Cambridge Associates, LLC.  The Cambridge US Venture Capital Index returned 0.2% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, ending three consecutive quarters of negative returns.  Of course, in an economy still clouded in doubt and pessimism, the positive news was paired with a cautionary outlook.  Managing Director Peter Mooradian raised questions about whether the asset class can generate sufficient exits to provide healthy long-term returns. 

It will be interesting to see the figures for the current quarter after Google's recent acquisition of AdMob for $750 million and EA's recent acquisition of PlayFish for $300 million (with an additional $100 million in earnouts).   

Friday Five: IPOs, Venture Capital Funds, Exits and More

We are adding a new feature to the blog.  Each Friday, we will link to the top five headlines for global entrepreneurs.  Of course, the bulk of those will often involve Silicon Valley, since that tech-concentrated center remains the global front line of technology and venture capital.  Enough intro banter.  Let's jump right into it.

  • Talk about a long time in the making.  On Wednesday, Ancestry.com, a website that allows people to trace their roots by searching online documents, priced its IPO of 7.4 million shares at $13.50.  By my math, that will bring in approximately $100 million in aggregate gross proceeds, assuming that the round is fully subscribed.  It took Ancestry.com a scant 26 years from the time it was founded until it priced its IPO, making it the oldest venture-backed IPO of 2009.  Talk about patience and perseverance!  Read more.
  • Who said that it was next to impossible for venture capitalists to raise additional funds in this economy?  Greylock Partners obviously missed that memo, as the Silicon Valley stalwart recently announced the closing of Greylock XIII, a $575 million fund.  They also announced the addition of Reid Hoffman, co-founder and current Executive Chairman of LinkedIn, as a new investing partner.  Read more.
  • I wonder what ridiculously expensive champagne former British investment bankers Eldar and Roy Tuvey will be drinking in celebration this weekend after selling their company, ScanSafe, to Cisco for up to $183 million earlier this week?  The founders are set to spit up to a cool $60 million between them.  With an exit like that, they can afford to take a bath--literally--in 1990 Louis Roederer Cristal Brut, which is priced around $2,500 per bottle.  The exit was also a good win for London-based venture capital fund Balderton Capital.  Yahoo Finance estimates that Balderton enjoyed a four times return on its four rounds of investment in ScanSafe.  Not bad, indeed.  Read more.
  • The government of the People's Republic of China doesn't seem squeamish about the future of its venture capital market.  China's key economic planning body recently launched 20 venture capital funds to develop China's growing technology sector.  Read more.  That news certainly seems to support estimates that China's private equity industry will grow by ten-fold over the next five years.  Read more.  Yes, I know that is two headlines combined into one, but who is truly counting anyway?
  • When Google head honcho Eric Schmidt talks, people tend to listen.  When he talks about his view of the employment trends in Silicon Valley's technology sector, even more people turn an inquisitive ear or two.  Read more.

Enjoy your weekend!

"Hello World"

OK, I stole that line from Tiger Woods just before his professional golf debut at the Greater Milwaukee Open in August 1996. Nevertheless, it is a pleasure to jump into the blogosphere with my colleagues around the globe to bring entrepreneurs and investors our thoughts and reactions to the happenings in the emerging company landscape--a landscape that has rapidly expanded beyond its golden hub in Silicon Valley to virtually every corner of the planet.

When I first started practicing law in the late '90s, the dot.com boom was in its heyday. Entrepreneurs with dreams of an early and lucrative exit flocked to Silicon Valley to set up shop and search for local venture capital dollars. Those dollars were spent on extravagant launch parties, marketing efforts and anything else to bring attention to a particular dot.com, with the hope of driving web traffic through the roof. Top venture capitalists were willing participants, investing tens of millions into companies that left Wall Street investors scratching their heads on how anyone could justify those valuations. Nobody cared. The blueprint was simple enough: start an Internet-based business, do whatever it takes to attract the attention and subsequent investment dollars from well-respected venture capital funds. Landing a top-tier venture fund meant that the bulge bracket investment banks would soon come calling for an IPO, and then everyone got fitly, filthy rich. 

The money was so easy to come by in Northern California that entrepreneurs and investors largely ignored other established or burgeoning centers of technology and investment wealth. Cross-border investment deals weren't common--in fact, they were frowned upon because that left less room for local, well-respected venture capital funds, which meant less chance for IPOs led by budge bracket i-banks, etc. Government participating in developing young companies was really limited to venture capitalists accessing the federal government's coffers to expand the size of their investment funds. Non-dilutive financing from the government wasn't a priority. And nobody cared about sovereign wealth funds. Again, the Silicon Valley blueprint for success didn't depend upon any of those things. 

The false economy (some preferred to simply label it "insanity") had to end sooner or later. It did, of course. But boy, it was fun while it lasted.

Fast-forward a decade and the emerging company landscape has changed dramatically. Gone are the days where merely attaching "dot.com" to a title drew the interest of top investors. In fact, it draws a cynical look today. Gone are the days of extravagant launch parties as a means of catapulting to IPO riches. Entrepreneurs actually have to build a business. Investment dollars aren't flying out of Sand Hill Road like 17-year locust swarms. Venture capitalists are much more conservative with their investments, assuming they aren't stuck in the unenviable position of trying to raise a new fund during one of the tougher global economies in history.

The realities of doing business today has completely changed the emerging company landscape. The world is now a much smaller place. Silicon Valley venture capitalists are searching all over the world in search of the next great company. Entrepreneurs are sometimes forced to look more and more to angel investors or funds located outside of Silicon Valley for early-stage funding. Cross-border deals are becoming more and more prevalent. The sovereign wealth funds in China and the Middle East are becoming players in the game. And the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in the United States and similar economic stimulus programs in other G20 countries have created a new, relatively untapped source of deep-pocket funding (non-dilutive funding, no less). 

In other words, the game has changed, whether temporarily or permanently is up for debate, though if I were a betting man (and I am in fact such a man), I am doubling down on the global platform becoming a bigger and bigger driver for emerging companies going forward. That brings us full circle to the purpose of this blog: leveraging our global network of partners and associates at Reed Smith to help bring a global perspective to the emerging-company happenings in the various geographic markets around the world.